JAVA: IBM in reportedly in talks to buy Sun Micros

HomeForumsStocks by SymbolJAVA: IBM in reportedly in talks to buy Sun Micros

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
March 18, 2009 at 6:44 pm #3117
 DynastyRG
March 18, 2009 at 6:44 pm #3118
 DynastyRG

Sun Microsystems Inc. saw its shares shoot up by more than 66% Wednesday following reports that it is in talks to be acquired by IBM Corp. for as much as $6.5 billion in a deal that would put hardware back at the core of Big Blue’s operations and bolster its computer-server business, according to a published report.

Sun climbed $3.31 a share to $8.27 after the Wall Street Journal reported that a deal with IBM could be reached this week, but that the talks are not certain to go through.

If the deal is finalized, it would be the largest purchase ever for Armonk, N.Y.-based IBM and would amount to a 100% premium over Sun’s closing price of $4.97 a share on Tuesday. Sun’s shares are down more than 70% over the past year.

God damn, i should have been on top of this! This is why I hate school sometimes.

March 19, 2009 at 3:46 am #3119
 Lomeli

Analysts said technology companies were looking to acquisitions as organic growth was difficult given the poor economy.

“Plus, valuations are also very cheap now,” said Tarun Sisodia, a technology sector analyst with Indian brokerage Anand Rathi Financial Services. “It’s a good time to pick up the companies that can contribute to your growth in these difficult times.”

This and the amount of cash IBM has are probably two huge factors in the purchase. Should be interesting to see IBM transform itself yet again.

March 19, 2009 at 3:49 am #3120
 Lomeli

There stock might have gained a lot of ground in the last couple days by closing at 8.27 but:

Sun stock is down 71 percent in the last 52 weeks,(and is still) a far cry from an all-time high of $258.75 that it touched during the dot-com boom.“

March 20, 2009 at 2:46 am #3121
 DynastyRG

well i think that such low stocks are good opportunities for investors like me who couldn’t afford it a few years back. With prices so low they are worth it as long as they don’t tank.

March 22, 2009 at 9:34 pm #3122
 laxman11

Buy on the rumor, sell on the news, right? ;)

March 23, 2009 at 2:31 am #3123
 DynastyRG

sadly by the time it reached my ears it was already news rather than rumour. I need to keep my ear to the ground to catch these marginal increases, a 30% jump is something is the type of quick rallies i like to jump on.

March 23, 2009 at 3:37 pm #3124
 laxman11

It’s so hard for me to make plays like these. I always get greedy when I should be selling and am always on SUPER high anxiety mode.

Oi, stock trading is no walk in the park.

March 24, 2009 at 12:13 am #3125
 DynastyRG

Yeah its hard to know when to sell. However the way I look at it, most investors would be buying and driving up the price based on the rumours so it can’t go much below the price I bought it at.

April 3, 2009 at 2:05 am #3126
 DynastyRG

IBM Corp. reportedly has cut its bid price for Sun Microsystems Inc. to a range of $9 to $10 a share — about $1 below what the parties were previously discussing — in return for assurances that the proposed buyout would go through, according to a media report Thursday.

Reports surfaced about two weeks ago that IBM was willing to pay $10 to $11 a share to acquire Sun. At that price, the deal would have been worth around $6.5 billion, not including Sun’s cash on hand, and would have been IBM’s largest-ever corporate acquisition.

Since then, talks reportedly have been held up by “extensive” due diligence by IBM, which is investigating which of Sun’s complex array of software licenses might conflict with its own, among other matters. The Journal reported that talks between the two parties have been continuing over the past two weeks.

April 6, 2009 at 7:17 pm #3127
 DynastyRG

Sun Microsystems Inc. shares plunged as much as 24% Monday following reports that the company’s board of directors turned down a proposed IBM Corp.’s acquisition offer of $7 billion.

However, the deal may still get done. The online edition of the Wall Street Journal reported that Sun’s board has split into two factions that are divided over a variety of issues. Both the WSJ and the New York Times reported that Sun’s board rejected a formal acquisition offer by IBM of $9.40 per share on Saturday, sending a notice terminating Sun’s agreement to negotiate exclusively with IBM.

April 6, 2009 at 8:52 pm #3128
 Lomeli

I heard that SUN has been shopping themselves around so there could be other companies interested in this acquisition as well.

April 20, 2009 at 9:24 pm #3129
 DynastyRG

Oracle Corp. on Monday said it will buy Sun Microsystems Inc., creator of widely used Java software, in a $5.6 billion, all-cash deal that unites two of Silicon Valley’s most storied technology companies.

The deal with Oracle comes shortly after IBM reportedly ended its own bid to buy Santa Clara, Calif.-based Sun the acquisition puts the company squarely in the mix for providing a complete suite of technology products used in corporate data centers — a market that is also being aggressively courted by heavyweights such as Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard and Cisco Systems.

“This kind of rounds out Oracle’s data center offering; all of these big companies are heading in that direction,” said software analyst Brendan Barnicle of Pacific Crest.

Though the deal puts Oracle into the hardware space for the first time, the company’s main target was Sun’s Java software business as well as its Solaris operating system, which is used for mainframe computers.

April 22, 2009 at 4:28 am #3130
 DynastyRG

Sun Microsystems Inc. has cleverly avoided becoming the next Yahoo Inc., a company that blew a serious acquisition offer by an archrival.

News accounts say Sun reached out to Oracle Corp.late last week when it became clear its talks with IBM were bogging down over price. Another big issue was that IBM would not commit to toughing it out with antitrust regulators over expected deal problems. Chairman Scott McNealy reportedly was gathering board support against an IBM-Sun marriage.

See story on McNealy here.

In fact, Oracle’s deal to buy Sun probably came about in part due to McNealy’s emphatic opposition to being acquired by fierce rival IBM, much as Jerry Yang, the co-founder of Yahoo fought behind the scenes against an acquisition of his company by Microsoft Corp.

It also helps that McNealy, one of the original four co-founders of Sun, is friendly with Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, and that the two companies have partnered for decades.

“The two have been close collaborators for over 20 years,” said Charles King, principal analyst with Pund-IT Inc., a consulting firm. “They share a huge number of customers. A large share of Sun customers has Oracle as the database of choice.”

June 27, 2009 at 11:30 pm #3131
 DynastyRG

In a statement issued Friday, Dan Wall, an attorney representing Oracle, said that the software giant was “almost able to resolve everything” with Justice Department regulators before a deadline for a second request for information.

Such second requests for information often involve divulging additional information to regulators keen on taking a closer look at a planned merger — in what can be a time-consuming process.

“I fully expect that the investigation will end soon and not delay the closing of the deal this summer,” Wall added.

A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

According to a disclosure filed by Sun with the Securities & Exchange Commission earlier this month, Oracle refiled its initial premerger notifications for the deal with the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission in late May, effectively restarting the automatic period of antitrust review that all mergers are subjected to.

That initial period expired Friday.

Sun spokeswoman Karen Kahn declined to comment, saying only that the initial antitrust review “has not yet expired as far as we’re concerned.”

Often, companies refile their initial notification if they feel it will give them a better chance of avoiding a second request for information, or at least of narrowing the scope of any forthcoming second request.

According to the statement by Oracle attorney Wall, regulators have asked for more information specifically about the licensing of Sun’s Java software.

David Turetsky, an antitrust attorney with Dewey & LeBoeuf in Washington, D.C. and a former deputy assistant attorney general for antitrust in the Clinton administration, said the interest in so-called “vertical integration” issues related to Oracle’s Java, which has been melded into the technologies of a number of Oracle competitors, would be unsurprising.

“The [antitrust] agencies have signaled that they intend to look carefully at vertical issues in mergers,” Turetsky said.

Predicting the outcome of a confidential Justice Department antitrust review is nearly impossible, Turetsky cautioned. Yet he said that when Oracle’s merger with Sun was proposed, “the general feeling was that it was likely to be able to be done as proposed.”

“That’s not to rule out the possibility of some sort of divestiture,” he added.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.