Key takeaways
- Crypto’s mainstream moment is here: Digital assets have moved well beyond speculation, with institutional adoption accelerating and regulatory frameworks finally taking shape, giving crypto-linked equities a level of legitimacy they didn’t have even two years ago.
- Different business models, different exposures: Not all crypto stocks are the same. Some mine Bitcoin, some hold it on their balance sheet as a treasury strategy, and others operate exchange or infrastructure platforms, so understanding what you’re actually buying matters more than just riding the sector.
- Volatility is the price of admission: These stocks can swing 10-20% in a week without blinking, and they’re heavily correlated to Bitcoin’s price action. If you can’t stomach that kind of drawdown or don’t have a long enough time horizon, this corner of the market will eat you alive.
I didn’t expect to be writing about crypto stocks for a Canadian investing audience back when I started Stocktrades, but here we are. Bitcoin pushing into new territory tends to drag a whole ecosystem of publicly traded companies along with it, and some of those companies are a lot easier to actually own than the coin itself. No wallets, no seed phrases, just a ticker in your brokerage account.
What’s changed in the last couple of years is the range of ways to get that exposure. You’ve got miners that live and die by electricity costs and network difficulty. You’ve got exchanges that make money whether the price goes up or down, as long as people keep trading. And you’ve got at least one company that’s turned itself into a leveraged bet on Bitcoin’s balance sheet value, which is a completely different animal than a mining operation.
That spread matters because these businesses don’t move together as cleanly as you’d think. A miner like HIVE Digital Technologies or Riot Platforms is exposed to hash rate economics and power contracts. MARA Holdings carries a similar profile but with its own scale and strategy around treasury management. Coinbase is a transaction business dressed up in crypto clothing, closer in spirit to a financial exchange than a miner. Strategy and Galaxy Digital each represent their own version of a corporate crypto bet, just built on different models entirely.
None of that makes this an easy sector to size correctly in a portfolio. Volatility here isn’t a side effect, it’s the whole point, and these stocks can swing harder in a week than most blue chip stocks move in a year. If you’re the type who also wants steadier ground elsewhere in the account, I’d treat this as a satellite position, not the core.
So where do things stand with each of these names right now, and what’s actually driving the next leg for each one? Let’s get into it.
In This Article
- Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY)
- Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN)
- HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE.TO)
- MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA)
- Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)
- Strategy Inc (MSTR)
Galaxy Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: GLXY)
Galaxy Digital Inc. is a leading digital asset and blockchain-focused financial services firm that bridges traditional finance with the emerging crypto economy...
Competitive Edge
- Galaxy sits at the intersection of institutional crypto plumbing (OTC, market making, lending) and physical infrastructure (data centers), giving it two distinct ways to monetize the same underlying blockchain and AI compute themes.
- A loan book that scaled past $1.4 trillion average size with over 1,700 counterparties suggests Galaxy has built real distribution and credit relationships that are hard for a new entrant to replicate quickly.
- The Data Centers segment turned income-positive with Adjusted EBITDA up sharply quarter over quarter, giving Galaxy a second growth vector that diversifies revenue away from pure crypto trading volatility.
- Founder-led by Michael Novogratz since 2018, the firm has survived multiple crypto cycles (2018 bear, 2022 FTX collapse) while competitors folded, a durability that itself becomes a trust signal for institutional counterparties.
By the Numbers
- Digital Assets Adjusted EBITDA nearly doubled to $246.8M in FY2025 from $113.3M, while Digital Assets Income Before Taxes surged 312.5% to $193.9M, showing the core trading and lending franchise is genuinely scaling.
- Global Markets average loan book size grew 116.6% YoY to $1.39 trillion, up from 72% growth the prior year, an acceleration that signals institutional counterparty demand is still building, not fading.
- Total trading counterparties grew to 1,620 from 1,328, a steady 22% expansion that broadens the revenue base beyond a handful of large clients.
- Equity funds 25% of total assets and debt-to-equity of 1.30x is actually low versus cash-rich peers in the space, giving the balance sheet more room than the headline leverage ratio suggests.
- FCF-to-OCF of 5.29x and FCF-to-EBITDA of 6.90x reflect a business where reported losses mask a much larger negative capex swing tied to data center buildout, not core trading deterioration.
Risk Factors
- Treasury and Corporate segment income before taxes collapsed to -$463.5M from +$290.3M, a 259.7% swing that wiped out gains from the Digital Assets segment and drove the consolidated net loss.
- Interest coverage sits at -3.72x and the report grades this distressed, meaning operating earnings don't come close to covering interest expense on $3.55B of total debt.
- Unlevered FCF of -$837.8M against a fcf_margin of -3.24% shows cash burn that dwarfs the reported net loss, with capex-to-OCF running at -4.29x, an unusually capital-intensive posture for an asset manager.
- Quick ratio of 0.32x versus a current ratio of 1.50x means most of the liquidity cushion sits in less-liquid current assets, not cash equivalents, a gap worth watching if funding markets tighten.
- ETF Assets KPI fell 18.5% YoY to $2.84 trillion after growing 119.2% the prior year, and Assets Under Stake growth decelerated sharply from 1,640% to 17.5%, showing the easiest comparisons are behind the company.
Coinbase Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: COIN)
Coinbase Global, Inc. is a foundational infrastructure provider for the global cryptoeconomy, operating the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States...
Competitive Edge
- The USDC economics with Circle are the most durable part of the model: Coinbase keeps all interest on USDC held on its own platform plus a share of the rest, so the revenue accrues from balances sitting still rather than from customers trading.
- Regulatory capture works in Coinbase's favour in the US. Being the compliant, publicly audited venue with state money transmitter licences and a NYDFS trust makes it the default custodian for spot bitcoin ETF issuers, a position offshore rivals like Binance cannot occupy.
- Base, the company's layer-2 chain, converts Coinbase from a fee taker into infrastructure. Sequencer revenue and the on-ramp position give it a claim on on-chain activity that never touches the centralised exchange order book.
- Custody, prime brokerage and staking create switching costs that retail trading does not. An institution that has passed diligence, signed custody agreements and wired collateral does not move venues over a few basis points of fee.
- The balance sheet lets management buy through downturns. Net cash of $2.3B and 49% equity funding of assets meant the firm could absorb the 2022 collapse without a rescue, which is precisely when weaker venues were forced to sell or fail.
By the Numbers
- Subscription and services revenue reached $2.83B in FY2025, up 22.6%, while transaction revenue crept up just 1.7% to $4.06B. Recurring-style revenue now covers roughly 39% of the top line versus 22% in FY2022, which cushions the trading cycle.
- Stablecoin revenue jumped 48.1% to $1.35B, the only major line that accelerated (31.1% prior year). That single line is now larger than all of Institutional net revenue plus blockchain rewards combined, and it scales with USDC float rather than trading activity.
- Institutional net revenue grew 38.8% to $480M on only 4.4% institutional volume growth, meaning take rate per dollar traded expanded sharply. That is the opposite of the fee compression narrative applied to the institutional book.
- Net cash of $2.31B against $6.48B gross debt, with cash per share of $32.30 against a $201 share price, and interest coverage near 9.8x. The debt is largely convertible paper, so the company is not exposed to floating refinancing costs.
- FCF margin of 42.3% and P/FCF of 19.9x sit below the 5-year average P/FCF of 21.5x, one of the few multiples not stretched. Cash generation is holding up far better than GAAP earnings, which carry crypto fair-value marks.
Risk Factors
- Quarterly momentum is far worse than the annual picture suggests: US revenue fell 20.8% then 12.4% QoQ, consumer net revenue dropped 22.8% then 20.3%, and assets on platform slid from $376B to $245.9B. The FY2025 annual numbers are stale.
- MTUs fell to 7.6 million in the latest quarter from 9.2 million at FY2025 year end, with consecutive QoQ declines of 10.9% and 7.3%. The paying user base is shrinking while consumer take rates are also falling.
- SBC ran at 14.9% of revenue ($939M) while the company bought back $2.46B of stock, yet share count fell only 0.54% in a year and has grown 26% a year over five years. Roughly a quarter of the buyback was pure dilution offset.
- EV/EBITDA of 58.1x against a 5-year average of 21.1x, a 176% premium, at the same time EBITDA fell 56.7% and EBIT fell 67.1%. The multiple is expanding as the earnings base shrinks, which is the worst combination.
- Blockchain rewards revenue fell 4% in FY2025 and another 33.5% then 17.4% QoQ, while custodial fee revenue went to zero. Two of the lines sold as diversification away from trading are themselves shrinking.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (TSX: HIVE)
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is a technology company primarily engaged in the mining of digital currencies and the provision of high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure...
Competitive Edge
- Green energy powered sites across Canada, Sweden, Iceland and Paraguay give HIVE some of the lowest cost power access in the mining industry, a structural edge as network difficulty keeps rising.
- The pivot toward high performance computing infrastructure lets HIVE monetize the same data centers for AI and cloud workloads, diversifying revenue away from pure bitcoin price exposure.
- Geographic diversification across four countries reduces single jurisdiction regulatory risk, relevant given past mining bans and energy surcharges in places like Kazakhstan and parts of the US.
- Six month total return of 78% shows the stock can move sharply higher on bitcoin cycle turns, giving management a window to raise equity opportunistically when sentiment improves.
By the Numbers
- Revenue grew 158% over the last filed year and 41% annually between FY2023 and FY2026, showing top line momentum most crypto miners can't match even amid a bitcoin price correction.
- Interest coverage of 25.4x and a current ratio of 1.96x show the balance sheet can service debt and near-term obligations despite negative net income.
- Analysts expect revenue to grow 30% a year from FY2026 to FY2028, reaching $505.0M by FY2028, with the EBITDA loss of -$10.0M in FY2027 flipping to $180.6M positive in FY2028.
- Gross margin held at 36% even as the company scaled into HPC infrastructure, suggesting the mining and hosting cost base isn't collapsing under expansion.
- Cash conversion cycle of -87 days, driven by a 116.7 day payables period against 29.4 days receivables, means suppliers are effectively financing working capital.
Risk Factors
- ROIC collapsed from 67% in FY2021 to -39% in FY2026, a swing the Management grade explicitly caps at 0 out of 10, meaning capital deployed into new sites and rigs is currently destroying value.
- Share count grew 24% a year over five years and 81% in the last year alone, while stock compensation ran at 37% of operating cash flow, a dilution pace that overwhelms any per-share economics.
- EV/EBITDA of 17.8x sits 297% above the 5-year average of 4.5x, and P/FCF of -8.7x is 207% above its -2.8x average, an unusually wide valuation gap for a business posting a -89% net margin.
- Operating margin of -42.8% against a 36% gross margin implies SG&A and depreciation are eating nearly the entire gross profit, not just growth investment.
- The stock sits 51% below its 52-week high and suffered a 94% five-year max drawdown that has not recovered, evidence that past rallies in this name have proven unsustainable.
MARA Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
MARA Holdings, Inc. is a leading digital asset technology company that specializes in cryptocurrency mining, with a primary focus on Bitcoin...
Competitive Edge
- MARA controls roughly 5.9% of global block rewards, the largest single share among public miners, which gives it scale in ASIC procurement and power contracting that smaller peers like Cipher or Hut 8 cannot match on price.
- Owning and operating sites rather than hosting with third parties, after exiting hosting revenue almost entirely, means MARA captures the power arbitrage itself instead of paying a margin to a landlord. That is where the durable cost advantage in mining sits.
- Holding mined bitcoin rather than selling it turns the company into a leveraged coin proxy with an operating business attached. For investors who want bitcoin exposure inside a brokerage account with no custody burden, that structure has its own demand base independent of mining economics.
- The energy footprint, roughly 70 EH/s of interconnected, low-cost power, is the scarce asset. AI data center developers are bidding for exactly these interconnect queue positions, giving MARA an option to convert sites to higher-value compute, as Core Scientific and TeraWulf have already done.
- Management has been early on immersion cooling and owns two-exahash-class sites with flexible curtailment agreements, which lets the fleet act as a grid demand response asset and earn power credits that offset mining costs during peak pricing.
By the Numbers
- Share of available miner rewards rose to 5.3% in FY2025 from 4.1%, and to 5.9% in the latest quarter, while bitcoin production fell only 6.7% in a year that included a halving. MARA is taking network share faster than its own hash rate is growing.
- Energized hash rate reached 70.3 EH/s in the latest quarter and blocks won rose to 700 from 653 sequentially. Production per unit of capacity is improving, which points to better fleet uptime rather than just more machines plugged in.
- Block rewards revenue of $848M grew 51.5% in FY2025 even as total bitcoin mined fell 6.7%, meaning the entire increase came from a higher bitcoin price and share gains, not volume. That is operating leverage to the coin, which is exactly the exposure buyers want.
- Quarterly bitcoin production has now risen three quarters in a row, up 11.7% then 7.8%, reaching 2,422 coins and 26.6 coins per day. Annual data still shows a decline, so the inflection is not yet visible in the yearly numbers.
- Cash per share of $1.08 plus tangible book of $3.80 against a $13.35 price means a large share of market value is backed by real assets, mostly bitcoin held on balance sheet. Book value per share of $4.12 sets a mark-to-market floor that most operating companies do not have.
Risk Factors
- Reported net margin of -430% and ROE of -107% are largely fair value marks on bitcoin holdings, not cash losses, but the cash picture is no better: operating cash flow to sales is -1.11x and free cash flow per share is -$3.21 against revenue per share of $2.00.
- Debt of $2.47B against $433M of cash leaves $2.03B net debt while interest coverage sits at -49.9x and operating cash flow to debt is -0.42x. Debt service is funded by selling coins or issuing shares, not by the mining business.
- Shares outstanding grew 7.4% in the past year while the company spent $26.5M on repurchases. The stated 11% shareholder yield is arithmetic, not cash returned from operations, since the money came from capital raised elsewhere.
- Stock compensation of $145.7M equals 18.1% of the $907M revenue base and roughly 5.5x the dollars spent on buybacks. Employees are being paid in equity at a rate that swamps any share count reduction.
- Contract revenue collapsed 39.2% to $58.7M as hosting fell 85.2% and transaction fees fell 72% to $9.2M. Every non-block-reward revenue line is shrinking, so the diversification story that management sells is not showing up in the segment data.
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
Riot Platforms, Inc. (formerly Riot Blockchain, Inc.) is a prominent vertically integrated Bitcoin mining and digital infrastructure company...
Competitive Edge
- Riot's vertically integrated model, in-house engineering plus owned mining and hosting infrastructure, gives it more control over deployment speed and unit economics than miners who outsource construction to third parties.
- The pivot toward data center hosting and engineering services provides a path to revenue that isn't purely tied to bitcoin price, a diversification most pure-play miners like Marathon lack.
- Owning large-scale power infrastructure in Texas positions Riot to benefit from demand response payments and potential AI/HPC hosting conversion, a call option competitors without comparable power contracts don't have.
By the Numbers
- Bitcoin mining gross profit surged 80% YoY to $237.3M in FY2025, outpacing the 79.5% revenue growth in that segment, showing the business is scaling profitably even as hash rate growth decelerated to 22.2% from 154% the prior year.
- Net cash position of $435.8M against just $35.6M total debt gives a net debt to EBITDA of 0.45x, meaning the balance sheet can absorb a mining downturn without solvency risk.
- Engineering gross profit swung from a $1.1M loss in FY2024 to $43.5M in FY2025, a segment that had been a drag turning into a real profit contributor.
- Revenue per share growth is keeping pace with headline revenue growth (24.5% YoY), an unusual outcome given the 6.4% one-year share count decline, so buybacks are protecting per-share economics rather than just offsetting dilution.
- Current ratio of 1.59x and quick ratio of 1.12x show short-term obligations are comfortably covered even while the core business burns cash at the operating level.
Risk Factors
- Stock-based compensation equals 97% of operating cash flow generated and shares outstanding grew 52% a year over five years, dilution at this scale overwhelms any benefit from the $8.8M in buybacks.
- Free cash flow is negative $1.64B while the company still returned money to shareholders, meaning capital returns are funded from the balance sheet or capital markets, not the business.
- ROIC sits at negative 39.3%, and even the improvement from negative 43% in FY2020 to negative 18% in FY2025 still leaves capital destruction as the base case for invested dollars.
- Capex to revenue of 89.7% and capex exceeding depreciation by 59% shows the company is spending far more building capacity than its existing asset base implies it needs to maintain, a bet on future hash price that hasn't paid off yet.
- Data Center Hosting revenue fell to zero in FY2024 from $27.3M in FY2023, a full segment collapse that isn't offset by the new Data Center Revenue line showing a 30% QoQ drop in the latest quarter.
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: MSTR)
Strategy Inc (formerly MicroStrategy) operates a dual corporate strategy, functioning as both an enterprise software provider and a Bitcoin treasury company. The company's core revenue-generating business is its AI-powered enterprise analytics platform, Strategy One, which provides business intelligence, data visualization, and cloud-based software solutions to organizations globally...
Competitive Edge
- Strategy One's subscription mix now makes up a much larger share of software revenue than three years ago, a structural shift toward recurring, higher visibility revenue away from one time license sales.
- Holding 672,500 bitcoin (and reportedly 846,000 in the most recent quarter) makes the company the largest corporate bitcoin holder, giving equity holders leveraged exposure to bitcoin without needing a brokerage account.
- The company has repeatedly tapped convertible debt and at the market equity issuance to fund bitcoin purchases, a financing model that works as long as the equity trades at a premium to net asset value.
By the Numbers
- Subscription revenue jumped 64.5% YoY to $175.7M in FY2025, up from 31.5% growth the prior year, showing the shift to recurring revenue is accelerating not stalling.
- Current ratio of 5.39x and cash ratio of 4.95x mean short term obligations are covered many times over, largely a function of the bitcoin holdings sitting on the balance sheet.
- Debt to equity of 0.15x looks conservative on paper, and total debt of $6.77B is dwarfed by the $58.9B market value of bitcoin held at year end FY2025.
- Three year total return compounded at 65.3% annually and five year at 20%, showing the bitcoin treasury strategy has generated outsized returns despite the operating business losing money.
Risk Factors
- Stock compensation ran at 547% of cash generated by the business while shares outstanding grew 23% a year over five years, a dilution rate that overwhelms any operating improvement.
- Total shareholder yield sits at negative 42%, meaning new share issuance is handing back far more value in dilution than any buyback or debt paydown returns.
- ROIC moved from -0.6% in FY2020 to -8.9% in FY2025, both negative, so the core software business is destroying more capital on invested capital today than five years ago.
- P/S of 129x is 182% above its own five year average of 45.7x, while the underlying software revenue of $477M has barely grown, up just 7.8% YoY.
- U.S., EMEA and Other Regions revenue all show as -100% YoY in the most recent annual cut, a reporting or disclosure change that removes visibility into where software revenue is actually generated.
What gets lost in all the noise around crypto stocks is that this isn’t really one sector. It’s three or four different businesses wearing the same costume. A miner’s fortunes are tied to electricity contracts and difficulty adjustments. An exchange profits off activity, not direction. A company stacking Bitcoin on its balance sheet is making a currency bet with extra steps. Lumping them together because they all rally when Bitcoin does is how people end up overexposed without realizing it.
My honest take is that most investors should pick a lane here rather than own a little of everything. Owning a miner and a treasury play and an exchange all at once isn’t diversification, it’s just concentrated risk spread across three tickers instead of one.
Figure out which version of this bet actually matches what you believe about where crypto goes from here, and size it like you’d size anything else that can cut both ways fast.